id,collection,dc.contributor.other[],dc.creator[],dc.date.accessioned,dc.date.available,dc.date.issued[],dc.description[],dc.format.issue[],dc.format.startpage[],dc.format.volume[],dc.identifier.uri,dc.language[],dc.publisher[],dc.subject.classification,dc.title[],dc.type[],dcterms.bibliographicCitation[],refterms.dateFOA "2248","10898/5351","HeinOnline","Chapman, Michael L.||Brazell, Cindy A.","2018-11-30T20:35:46Z","2018-11-30T20:35:46Z","1988","Note","3","1033","39","http://hdl.handle.net/10898/7564","English","Mercer University: Walter F. George School of Law","Land Use||State and Local Government Law||Fees","Mercer Law Review Vol. 039 Issue 03-050 pg. 1033 - When Exactions Become Extortion: The Supreme Court Draws the Line in Nollan v. California Coastal Commission","Text","39 Mercer L. Rev. 1033 (1987-1988)","2020-09-29T13:41:57Z"